Minutes 2022-11-04

Author

Joseph Rickert

Published

November 4, 2022

  • Bob Engle (Biogen)
  • Ellis Hughes (GSK)
  • Eric Nantz (Eli Lilly)
  • Gregory Chen (MSD)
  • Heng Wang (Roche/Genentech)
  • Honghong Zhou (Moderna)
  • HyeSoo Cho (FDA)
  • Jizu Zhi (FDA)
  • Joel Laxamana (Roche/Genentech)
  • Joseph Rickert (R Consortium)
  • Lei Zhao (Roche/Genentech)
  • Nan Xiao (Merck)
  • Ning Leng (Roche/Genentech)
  • Paul Schuette (FDA)
  • Renping Zhang (Johnson & Johnson)
  • Robert Devine (Johnson & Johnson)
  • Saghir Bashir (Argenx)
  • Stephanie Lussier (Moderna)
  • Tadeusz Lewandowski (Roche/Genentech)
  • Yilong Zhang (Meta)
  • Yiwen Luo (Merck)
  • Yutong Liu (Moderna)

The video is available on the R Consortium YouTube Channel

The meeting began with EN summarizing his understanding of the comments made by PS about his preliminary look at the Pilot 2 submission package.

The following is a summary of Paul’s comments which were made in a email exchange with the workgroup members on 10-27-22:

Eric stated that the updates appear to be relatively minor and would not be difficult to accomplish.

The submission team agreed to target 11-18-2022 as the target submission date.

Action: JBR to put a 9AM 11-18-2022 on the calendar for the submission.

JBR asked Paul to describe the boundary between a useful amount and too much interactivity in a shiny submissions app. Paul replied that it a way to think about it would be the difference between exploratory and inferential analysis. The problem with inferential analysis is the usual problem with p-values, subgroups and cherry picking. Inferential analysis is not the way to go. A Kaplan-Meier curve would be considered an exploratory safety analysis.

When asked if the guidance on interactivity was likely to stand for some time or change with familiarity Paul replied that it was his personal opinion that since it is consistent with the ASA Statement on p-values it will probably stand.

Paul also remarked that interactivity facilitating pre-specified analyses would probably be fine.

The following links may be helpful with understanding potential problems with on subgroup analyses:

Joel Laxamana gave an update on the Pilot 3 effort:

Action: Joel will add this explanatory material to the Pilot 3 GitHub repo.

Action: Joel will send a list of Pilot 3 team members to be added to the invitation list for this meeting.

Action: The Pilot 3 team will submit a written proposal to the FDA describing the process of unpacking the submission and setting up for analysis. The target date is to have this proposal ready for the 12-02-2022 Submissions WG meeting.

Lei Zhao asked if it would be a problem submitting data in SAS in doing the analysis in R. In general there is no problem, however the FDA suggests using a limited number of tools and using standard tools to do any translations between formats. The FDA prefers using scripted languages as opposed to using a GUI.

Ning will be presented at the R/Pharma conference on Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 11AM Eastern Time. The next meeting of the regular meeting of the group will be at 9AM Pacific Time on Friday, December 2, 2022.